<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comedy Spec Script 2010 — What is hot and what is not</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tv-calling.com/comedy-spec-script-2010-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tv-calling.com/comedy-spec-script-2010-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s for you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 04:24:20 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.tv-calling.com/comedy-spec-script-2010-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tv-calling.com/?p=1664#comment-318</guid>
		<description>Oh, wow! This is such interesting stuff. I&#039;ve been working on a &quot;Modern Family&quot; spec for a little while and I intend to send it out for fellowships and I thought I&#039;d be zany and different by choosing that show -- looks like I&#039;m not very unique at ALL! In some ways, that&#039;s a comfort, though now I fear that whoever reads the script will be burnt out on &quot;MF&quot; specs... Still, I have so much more confidence in this script than I have with anything else I&#039;ve written -- I just feel like I was born to write &quot;MF&quot; scripts! -- and I&#039;ve had such a good time writing it, I feel like that alone has been worth it. (Though I&#039;d still REALLY like to be accepted in a fellowship program, of course!) Anyway, thanks for all this awesome info, awesome site :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, wow! This is such interesting stuff. I’ve been working on a “Modern Family” spec for a little while and I intend to send it out for fellowships and I thought I’d be zany and different by choosing that show — looks like I’m not very unique at ALL! In some ways, that’s a comfort, though now I fear that whoever reads the script will be burnt out on “MF” specs… Still, I have so much more confidence in this script than I have with anything else I’ve written — I just feel like I was born to write “MF” scripts! — and I’ve had such a good time writing it, I feel like that alone has been worth it. (Though I’d still REALLY like to be accepted in a fellowship program, of course!) Anyway, thanks for all this awesome info, awesome site :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rilz</title>
		<link>http://www.tv-calling.com/comedy-spec-script-2010-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Rilz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tv-calling.com/?p=1664#comment-316</guid>
		<description>Great analysis. I&#039;m of the opinion that Modern Family/Community are the shows to spec seeing as, though you are right, they are most likely going to be good for a few seasons and are brand spanking new - also they are completely serial so spec one now it should be good for a few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great analysis. I’m of the opinion that Modern Family/Community are the shows to spec seeing as, though you are right, they are most likely going to be good for a few seasons and are brand spanking new — also they are completely serial so spec one now it should be good for a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.tv-calling.com/comedy-spec-script-2010-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/comment-page-1/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 02:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tv-calling.com/?p=1664#comment-313</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this awesome post AND the scripts :) You&#039;re spectacular. Womp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this awesome post AND the scripts :) You’re spectacular. Womp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Martinsson</title>
		<link>http://www.tv-calling.com/comedy-spec-script-2010-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Martinsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tv-calling.com/?p=1664#comment-300</guid>
		<description>Thanks for providing the scripts for some of the shows you mentioned. Very helpful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for providing the scripts for some of the shows you mentioned. Very helpful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheddarhead</title>
		<link>http://www.tv-calling.com/comedy-spec-script-2010-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheddarhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tv-calling.com/?p=1664#comment-275</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been wondering about this too. I&#039;m guessing that similar content is what a producer would look for in a potential staff writer. I&#039;ve been always been told to write a spec for a show that&#039;s similar in tone to the one you&#039;d like to staff on. If that&#039;s true, I would think a Nurse Jackie would be a perfect sample for Dexter or BB. 

And as far as the Fellowships go, according to their websites its all about writing a great script, not whether the show you chose is &quot;appropriate&quot;. I know people have gotten into Disney with Dexter scripts, and somebody recently got into Warner Bros. with a Sarah Silverman spec.

But if you opt for Party Down and need a sample script, just holler ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been wondering about this too. I’m guessing that similar content is what a producer would look for in a potential staff writer. I’ve been always been told to write a spec for a show that’s similar in tone to the one you’d like to staff on. If that’s true, I would think a Nurse Jackie would be a perfect sample for Dexter or BB. </p>
<p>And as far as the Fellowships go, according to their websites its all about writing a great script, not whether the show you chose is “appropriate”. I know people have gotten into Disney with Dexter scripts, and somebody recently got into Warner Bros. with a Sarah Silverman spec.</p>
<p>But if you opt for Party Down and need a sample script, just holler ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.tv-calling.com/comedy-spec-script-2010-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 02:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tv-calling.com/?p=1664#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Fantastic site!

Question: I consider myself a writer who could write for both comedy and drama, but, ultimately... my ideal would be to write for an hour episodic that infuses (dark) comedy and/or finds its characters in potentially humorous scenarios - every now and again (e.g., Breaking Bad &amp; Dexter - both of which I&#039;m not speccing this year).

Anyway, I wondered your thoughts on speccing something like Nurse Jackie, as a means for getting on an hour show... as opposed to Glee, for example - which, to me, is a full on musical comedy (albeit, heartfelt at  times) - even though it&#039;s an hour episodic?

I know from personal experience that speccing something too dark for these Fellowships (like Dexter or BB) could be a major hindrance. They USE your winning spec to get staffed on THEIR shows... and Dexter ain&#039;t Disneyfied.  Perhaps Nurse Jackie isn&#039;t either?

Also, pondering Party Down... but feel that would place me in the comedy world for sure - no ifs ands or buts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic site!</p>
<p>Question: I consider myself a writer who could write for both comedy and drama, but, ultimately… my ideal would be to write for an hour episodic that infuses (dark) comedy and/or finds its characters in potentially humorous scenarios — every now and again (e.g., Breaking Bad &amp; Dexter — both of which I’m not speccing this year).</p>
<p>Anyway, I wondered your thoughts on speccing something like Nurse Jackie, as a means for getting on an hour show… as opposed to Glee, for example — which, to me, is a full on musical comedy (albeit, heartfelt at  times) — even though it’s an hour episodic?</p>
<p>I know from personal experience that speccing something too dark for these Fellowships (like Dexter or BB) could be a major hindrance. They USE your winning spec to get staffed on THEIR shows… and Dexter ain’t Disneyfied.  Perhaps Nurse Jackie isn’t either?</p>
<p>Also, pondering Party Down… but feel that would place me in the comedy world for sure — no ifs ands or buts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.tv-calling.com/comedy-spec-script-2010-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tv-calling.com/?p=1664#comment-204</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just because something is everlasting and has some audience you should spec it.
No one is forbidding anyone from speccing &lt;em&gt;Two and a Half Men&lt;/em&gt;, there are simply other alternatives.
Like &lt;em&gt;C.S.I.&lt;/em&gt; for dramas, &lt;em&gt;Two and a Half Men&lt;/em&gt; has now become kind of an institution in its own genre. It is still successfull, and on the air (for some time probably).
With that said, it will enter next fall its eigth season (and 160th episode). 
Are you really sure you have an original idea for a seven-year-old sitcom?
If yes, who&#039;s to say you shouldn&#039;t go for it. 
Chances are though that it&#039;s already been done, either by the show, or by another speccer.
And if you think your story is such an obvious fit to the series, then the writers on staff probably thought about it before you. Think of the reasons it didn&#039;t make the cut.

If you&#039;re looking into a traditional multicam, what&#039;s wrong with &lt;em&gt;The Big Bang Theory&lt;/em&gt;?
I personally don&#039;t find &lt;em&gt;TBBT&lt;/em&gt; &quot;cooler&quot; to spec than &lt;em&gt;2AHM&lt;/em&gt;, it&#039;s just more recent (not too old, not too new, with just the right amount of episodes), and even has the same popularity.
On the other hand, I understand &lt;em&gt;Modern Family/Community&lt;/em&gt; being thought of as &quot;cooler&quot; to spec.
However, as I pointed out in the breakdown, it&#039;s on there for a reason: people are &lt;em&gt;already &lt;/em&gt;speccing it.
Whether you like it or not, the spec cycle is moving at a much faster rate nowadays. First-season successes are renewed early, and are even more appealing.

Regarding &lt;em&gt;How I Met Your Mother&lt;/em&gt;, it is, at best, living its last year as a &quot;Mainstream&quot;. This is because of a few reasons.
First off, like for &lt;em&gt;2AHM&lt;/em&gt;, are you really positive your original idea hasn&#039;t been done?
Secondly, there are some longevity issues with the show. I certainly wouldn&#039;t call it a &quot;huge hit.&quot;
You might mention the Season 6 renewal, but unlike &lt;em&gt;TBBT&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;2AHM&lt;/em&gt;, it didn&#039;t get a multiyear pickup. It&#039;s basically still on &quot;wait &amp; see&quot; mode. Plus, Bays and Thomas &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i888f5f58648771057edccd3b1fa7a610&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;are already moving on&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;.
Now, sure, it&#039;ll probably get to its final Season 7, but by that time the show will have reached &lt;em&gt;2AHM&lt;/em&gt;&#039;s current lifespan (see where I&#039;m going with this?). 

This &lt;strong&gt;doesn&#039;t&lt;/strong&gt; mean you should throw your already-existing &lt;em&gt;HIMYM &lt;/em&gt;spec away; just that, if you were wondering about writing &lt;em&gt;right now&lt;/em&gt; a &lt;em&gt;brand-new&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;HIMYM&lt;/em&gt;, you might want to reconsider.
Point is the same as &lt;em&gt;Two and a Half Men&lt;/em&gt;: there are (perhaps better) fresher alternatives.
The latter are that way, not because they&#039;re &quot;cooler,&quot; but simply because they have the ratings and content to back it up.
A spec must not only work for you right now, but must also have the potential to work for you later down the line.
What&#039;s the point of spending months and months writing and polishing the perfect spec script, if it&#039;s just going to end up being irrelevant?


&lt;strong&gt;@Jen&lt;/strong&gt;
Send in whichever you think has the best chance of you getting the fellowship.
At the end of the day, it all comes down to your talent and how you were able to nail your script (not just because you chose a hot show).
If your &lt;em&gt;Office &lt;/em&gt;spec is the funniest, best written spec in the pile, who cares if the show itself is a bit stale.
Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s not just because something is everlasting and has some audience you should spec it.<br />
No one is forbidding anyone from speccing <em>Two and a Half Men</em>, there are simply other alternatives.<br />
Like <em>C.S.I.</em> for dramas, <em>Two and a Half Men</em> has now become kind of an institution in its own genre. It is still successfull, and on the air (for some time probably).<br />
With that said, it will enter next fall its eigth season (and 160th episode).<br />
Are you really sure you have an original idea for a seven-year-old sitcom?<br />
If yes, who’s to say you shouldn’t go for it.<br />
Chances are though that it’s already been done, either by the show, or by another speccer.<br />
And if you think your story is such an obvious fit to the series, then the writers on staff probably thought about it before you. Think of the reasons it didn’t make the cut.</p>
<p>If you’re looking into a traditional multicam, what’s wrong with <em>The Big Bang Theory</em>?<br />
I personally don’t find <em>TBBT</em> “cooler” to spec than <em>2AHM</em>, it’s just more recent (not too old, not too new, with just the right amount of episodes), and even has the same popularity.<br />
On the other hand, I understand <em>Modern Family/Community</em> being thought of as “cooler” to spec.<br />
However, as I pointed out in the breakdown, it’s on there for a reason: people are <em>already </em>speccing it.<br />
Whether you like it or not, the spec cycle is moving at a much faster rate nowadays. First-season successes are renewed early, and are even more appealing.</p>
<p>Regarding <em>How I Met Your Mother</em>, it is, at best, living its last year as a “Mainstream”. This is because of a few reasons.<br />
First off, like for <em>2AHM</em>, are you really positive your original idea hasn’t been done?<br />
Secondly, there are some longevity issues with the show. I certainly wouldn’t call it a “huge hit.“<br />
You might mention the Season 6 renewal, but unlike <em>TBBT</em> and <em>2AHM</em>, it didn’t get a multiyear pickup. It’s basically still on “wait &amp; see” mode. Plus, Bays and Thomas <b><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i888f5f58648771057edccd3b1fa7a610" rel="nofollow">are already moving on</a></b>.<br />
Now, sure, it’ll probably get to its final Season 7, but by that time the show will have reached <em>2AHM</em>’s current lifespan (see where I’m going with this?). </p>
<p>This <strong>doesn’t</strong> mean you should throw your already-existing <em>HIMYM </em>spec away; just that, if you were wondering about writing <em>right now</em> a <em>brand-new</em> <em>HIMYM</em>, you might want to reconsider.<br />
Point is the same as <em>Two and a Half Men</em>: there are (perhaps better) fresher alternatives.<br />
The latter are that way, not because they’re “cooler,” but simply because they have the ratings and content to back it up.<br />
A spec must not only work for you right now, but must also have the potential to work for you later down the line.<br />
What’s the point of spending months and months writing and polishing the perfect spec script, if it’s just going to end up being irrelevant?</p>
<p><strong>@Jen</strong><br />
Send in whichever you think has the best chance of you getting the fellowship.<br />
At the end of the day, it all comes down to your talent and how you were able to nail your script (not just because you chose a hot show).<br />
If your <em>Office </em>spec is the funniest, best written spec in the pile, who cares if the show itself is a bit stale.<br />
Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
