<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drama Spec Script 2010 — What is hot and what is not</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tv-calling.com/drama-spec-script-2010-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tv-calling.com/drama-spec-script-2010-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s for you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 04:24:20 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will K.</title>
		<link>http://www.tv-calling.com/drama-spec-script-2010-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Will K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 09:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tv-calling.com/?p=1738#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Is it really that important that a spec has to stay completely current with what&#039;s going on in a ongoing, serialized series?  If it did, nobody&#039;s spec would be relevant, as most shows advance their overall plot at least somewhat.  Otherwise, some people&#039;s specs would be usable for like a month.  It doesn&#039;t seem very practical for the movers and shakers to demand that spec writers keep their specs as completely current as possible.  Isn&#039;t there some kind of leeway? Or do they actually demand that?  It seems to me that if the writer has great, interesting dialogue and plot, and perfectly captures the tone of the show and characters, then that should be enough to get noticed, despite if the actual show has changed its arc after you&#039;ve written your spec.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it really that important that a spec has to stay completely current with what’s going on in a ongoing, serialized series?  If it did, nobody’s spec would be relevant, as most shows advance their overall plot at least somewhat.  Otherwise, some people’s specs would be usable for like a month.  It doesn’t seem very practical for the movers and shakers to demand that spec writers keep their specs as completely current as possible.  Isn’t there some kind of leeway? Or do they actually demand that?  It seems to me that if the writer has great, interesting dialogue and plot, and perfectly captures the tone of the show and characters, then that should be enough to get noticed, despite if the actual show has changed its arc after you’ve written your spec.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Baldwin</title>
		<link>http://www.tv-calling.com/drama-spec-script-2010-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Baldwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 16:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tv-calling.com/?p=1738#comment-333</guid>
		<description>The Good Wife, then Castle. Eureka, Burn Notice or Leverage perhaps, depending on what stories come to mind. If I can swing a good Caprica or Sons of Anarchy, I&#039;d love to write one of these as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Good Wife, then Castle. Eureka, Burn Notice or Leverage perhaps, depending on what stories come to mind. If I can swing a good Caprica or Sons of Anarchy, I’d love to write one of these as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.tv-calling.com/drama-spec-script-2010-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/comment-page-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 18:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tv-calling.com/?p=1738#comment-325</guid>
		<description>Great site and lists....

I love True Blood and am looking to write a spec for it, but I am heeding your words on being aware of Ball changing the mythology and stories around, etc. 

As for something lighter, I&#039;m looking at doing In Plain Sight--its not on your list so I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s hot or not...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site and lists.…</p>
<p>I love True Blood and am looking to write a spec for it, but I am heeding your words on being aware of Ball changing the mythology and stories around, etc. </p>
<p>As for something lighter, I’m looking at doing In Plain Sight–its not on your list so I don’t know if it’s hot or not…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bera</title>
		<link>http://www.tv-calling.com/drama-spec-script-2010-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Bera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tv-calling.com/?p=1738#comment-280</guid>
		<description>Supposing you were going to send a spec to Justified, what TV show would you all recomend speccing. My current top pic would be Burn Notice, (Strong lead, lightly serialized, action it has a number of decent parallels with Justified). Thoughts? Also, does anyone know where I can find Justified scripts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supposing you were going to send a spec to Justified, what TV show would you all recomend speccing. My current top pic would be Burn Notice, (Strong lead, lightly serialized, action it has a number of decent parallels with Justified). Thoughts? Also, does anyone know where I can find Justified scripts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.tv-calling.com/drama-spec-script-2010-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 22:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tv-calling.com/?p=1738#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Interesting you should ask that as I was discussing this very question with a friend a few days ago. We ended up with the same conclusion: &lt;em&gt;Justified &lt;/em&gt;is at the moment still to young of a show to spec (in terms of finding the right &#039;voice&#039; for your script). However, I&#039;m sure that by this time next year, it will be a good speccer. Wait &amp; See.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting you should ask that as I was discussing this very question with a friend a few days ago. We ended up with the same conclusion: <em>Justified </em>is at the moment still to young of a show to spec (in terms of finding the right ‘voice’ for your script). However, I’m sure that by this time next year, it will be a good speccer. Wait &amp; See.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bera</title>
		<link>http://www.tv-calling.com/drama-spec-script-2010-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/comment-page-1/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Bera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 07:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tv-calling.com/?p=1738#comment-255</guid>
		<description>What do you think about the Speccability of Justified, assuming it gets renewed, (which I would say would be pretty safe bet at this point.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think about the Speccability of Justified, assuming it gets renewed, (which I would say would be pretty safe bet at this point.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.tv-calling.com/drama-spec-script-2010-what-is-hot-and-what-is-not/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tv-calling.com/?p=1738#comment-222</guid>
		<description>I did a Chuck spec at the end of Season 2, anticipating season 3.  It works well as a Chuck story but Season 3 ended up being a fundamental shift in the way the show operates.  
Essentially, I went light, they went &quot;Chuck goes Emo&quot;... well, comparatively, at least.
Thus I&#039;ve set that baby aside and gotten knee deep in a Mentalist spec.  Thankfully, that&#039;s going well.  
I put the Chuck spec up on my site, so feel free to drop by and give it a read. I&#039;ve got a Battlestar spec there as well for those who liked that series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did a Chuck spec at the end of Season 2, anticipating season 3.  It works well as a Chuck story but Season 3 ended up being a fundamental shift in the way the show operates.<br />
Essentially, I went light, they went “Chuck goes Emo”… well, comparatively, at least.<br />
Thus I’ve set that baby aside and gotten knee deep in a Mentalist spec.  Thankfully, that’s going well.<br />
I put the Chuck spec up on my site, so feel free to drop by and give it a read. I’ve got a Battlestar spec there as well for those who liked that series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
