Featured Posts

Post image for How to land that first job in television

Devon DeLapp posted a while ago a technique he used to land a job on a TV Show even though he was a “complete stranger to the entertainment industry”.

Although certainly not a miracle solution, I’ve heard that it indeed worked for some people. So even though it takes a lot of patience and mindless typing to get through it, if it works…
He’s also posted a nice tool to help you cope with the numbers and names you get during the process.
I bet it can also be used for other stuff!
Anyway, there’s also a key thing to keep in mind when applying for a PA job Devon says:
Appear willing to do anything.
He also says that a reasonable ratio before being offered a position is 4 to 8 interviews. So if you don’t get offered one after that, revise yourself!

Good luck in your hunt.


Email This Post Print This Post

Be the first to comment

Post image for The Dark Hero

I finally saw last night The Dark Knight.

I had not a lot to do yesterday actually.
I went to that American bookstore. I was disapointed by the small choice of books they had. W.H. Smith is so much better if you ever need an anglophone bookstore in Paris.
I bought a book I’ve been wanting to read for a long time now, The Road by Cormy McCarthy (you know, the guy that wrote No Country for Old Men).
I went over to the movie theatre to see when TDK was showing… I had 2 hours to kill.
Long story short I came back to the theatre over an hour before TDK was supposed to be shown. I bought my ticket (7 euros/11 dollars, ouch) and waited in front of the movie theatre. 20 minutes later, a dozen of people had already morphed into somewhat of a queue in front of the movie theatre. We were fortunately allowed to wait inside. Half an hour later, the queue had grown to over 200 people.
It should be noted that TDK just came out yesterday here in France.
I think there were even more people waiting to see a “normal” screening of TDK than there was for the premiere of Cloverfield I went to the day before it came out!

I came out of the theatre ecstatic.
It was amazing!

But why I am talking about that now?
Well for once because I might become amnesiac.
And more importantly because, yet again, it got me thinking. Yes, I think about stuff, deal with it.

It especially got me thinking about a post I read a while back about (super)heroes and their flaws.
I believe TDK correlates directly to that idea, especially for both Bruce Wayne and Harvey Dent.
To make a hero believable, we need him/her to be flawed. We need him/her to have limits. We need him/her to be vincible.
Bruce Wayne is a human that becomes a vigilante at night. But he is still a human behind his (too-much-technologically-advanced) suit. This is reminded to us early on in the movie when he is bit by a rottweiler (physical failing).

What is interesting to see is that Bruce Wayne can be faillible as a human (at least to the audience) but Batman, the facade, must be invincible. The emotional failing that is Rachel towards Bruce Wayne is absent in Batman (I’m talking here in the POV of the Gotham people, not the audience), to avoid an obvious correlation between the two, and therefore Batman’s identity being revealed. The Joker quickly finds the emotional weak spot of Batman/Wayne and exploits it brilliantly when he forces Batman/Wayne to make a choice between the woman he loves (Rachel) or “a greater good” (Dent). Knowing that Batman/Wayne will choose Rachel instead of Dent, the Joker “mixes up” the address, leading Batman/Wayne to save Dent (the Joker’s “Ace”).
The hero ultimately overcomes his personal failures and realizes that the facade must become a scapegoat in order for the legacy of Dent to continue. This realisation incidently is induced by Lucius Fox’s comments (in the role of the mentor).
On the other hand, we have Harvey Dent. Unlike the “superhero”, he doesn’t overcome his flaws and therefore becomes a villain. Like Bruce Wayne, this white knight has problems of his own; after all, he is also human. He is a hero to Gotham City as well as Batman’s glimmer of hope for a normal life, but his nobleness is actually a facade as well, as he is easily manipulated towards his other flaw (besides Rachel), that is “the luck of the draw”. Like Batman, he relies on what he believes in, although when what he loves is taken away from him, unlike Batman, he goes beyond his values and is consumed by vengeance, therefore becoming what he was fighting against all along.

Examples of flawed heroes (and therefore believable heroes) can be found now everywhere in fiction:
Tony Stark must overcome his physical problems to become what he wants to be.
The next volume of Heroes, Villains, will most likely delve into the dark side of some of the heroes.
The James Bond franchise successfully reinvented itself by giving Bond real flaws that could be really exploited by his ennemies. This will be directly seen in the next Bond movie, Quantum of Solace, when Bond, for the first time impacted by the events that have transpired in the previous movie, goes in a blood-filled quest for vengeance (the trailer says it all).
Buffy “The Slayer” Summers is also a faillible hero that goes to “dark places” in seasons 5 and 6.
Willow Rosenberg can be compared to Harvey Dent, especially at the end of season 6. When they both lost their loved ones, they both went to the only refuge and haven that was left for them: magic for one, luck for the other.

In a realistic setting, the line between a hero and a villain is ultimately a small one. A flawed hero can easily be tempted to “cross the line”.
Those flaws is what helps us identify to our heroes.


Email This Post Print This Post

Be the first to comment

Post image for Visa Breakdown — Part Two

Now that we’ve seen Non-immigrant Visas, time for the Green Card ones.

Again, all that you see here is from my own research. I am not an immigration lawyer, so if you’re seriously considering any of these options do your own research, don’t hold my word for it! That said, I’m not going to start inventing facts as I’m in the same situation anyway.

B) Green Cards

Probably the goal for everyone wanting to live in the U.S., Green Cards are next to impossible to obtain without U.S. relatives, really strong jobs or lots of luck.

All the green cards basically entitle you to unlimited stay in the U.S. as well as the ability to work there.

There are 3 main categories of Green Cards:
- Family/Marriage
- Work
- Green Card Lottery AKA Diversity Visa Program

I will not talk about the family/marriage one because I’m pretty sure that if you had an American mother or wife you wouldn’t be here right now.

Now let’s get down to business with the Employment Green Cards (or Visa).
This category can be broke down in 5 visa types (from E1 to E5), although only the first 2 really apply to us.
Employment Visas are given based on the “preference”, that is the number next to the E. The lower it is, the better chance you have of getting it (as long as your file is very strong).

Employment First Preference (E1):
Basically an O1 visa but with stricter conditions.
E1 Visas are for “priority workers” only, that means “persons of extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics”.
You must indeed have a strong (read national or international) carreer, and acclaim, behind you before trying to apply for an E1 Visa.
The good news is that this is basically the only work visa that you can file on your own: you do not need to have a job offer in the U.S. before you apply.

Employment Second Preference (E2)
You need to be a “person with exceptional ability in the arts, sciences, or business”. Notice the difference between an E1 Visa where you had to be “extraordinary”.
This time around though you need an employer to file a petition on your behalf: you need a job offer before applying.
There is one exception though: National Interest Waiver. To obtain this waiver, you must prove that the exemption would be of the national interest. This little site is quite helpful listing all the different proofs you need and how to obtain them.

Now time for the Diversity Visa Program.
I will probably go over this one in more details around October (the time when the DV-2010 Lottery opens).
Basically between October and December the lottery opens and you fill out a form to apply for the lottery (free).
Hundreds of countries are allowed in, while others are not.
That means millions of forms, and a very slim chance for you, as basically 50 000 Diversity Visas are awarded each year.

As always, if you have questions please feel free to email me or post a comment.


Email This Post Print This Post

Be the first to comment

Post image for Visa Breakdown — Part One

Here is the concise visa breakdown.

The hypothesis that will be used in the breakdown is that you are “a writer in Europe or Canada who wants to be able to work as a writer in the U.S.A. and has no immediate relative there”.

I will probably dedicate posts for a couple of these different visas as time goes by, but for now I wanted to give an overall guide to the various options.

All that you see here is from my own research. I am not an immigration lawyer, so if you’re seriously considering any of these options do your own research, don’t hold my word for it! That said, I’m not going to start inventing facts as I’m in the same situation anyway.

Two main categories of Visas can be distinguished:
A) Temporary Visas (or non-immigrant)
B) Green Cards (or immigrant)

In this post I will talk about the Temporary AKA Non-immigrant Visas.

A) Non-immigrant Visas

For work-related visas, your stay in the US on a non-immigrant visa will primarily be dependant on your job (or lack of).
Basically you have to have a job offer before even going to the U.S. which is difficult, to say the least, in our field of work. Your employer must fill tons of forms proving that you are the only one that can be able to do the task at hand instead of one of the other 300+ million Americans. The reason for all that is to show that you won’t become a “burden” to the U.S.
The duration of your visa is also dependant on the duration of your job, with each visa having a limitation.

The most used and known about work visa is the H-1B visa.
Duration of stay: 3 years, extendible to 6 max. A few (complicated) exceptions give an extended year or three at best.
What it is about: This visa allows a U.S. employer to employ foreign workers skilled in specialty occupations, but only when qualified U.S. citizens or residents are not available.
What’s the problem?: The main point here is that you need a specific job offer from an employer willing to give time to help with the visa process.
Not so easy if you want to be a PA right?
You must also have at least a bachelor’s degree and if a miracle happens and you get your H-1B visa, you are basically tied to your current job.

A rare visa to obtain (only if you already have somewhat of a carreer) is the O-1 visa.
Duration of stay: As long as your job lasts.
What it is about: You need to have “extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics, or extraordinary achievements in the motion picture and television field”. This is mostly proven by “sustained national or international acclaim”. Also, you need a job in the US.
What’s the problem?: Again, you need a job before applying for the visa. Not to mention the “international acclaim” thingy.
If you indeed have a strong carreer (and acclaim), and intend to move to the U.S., you should look over to the E1/E2 Green Card (cf my next post on the Green Cards).

For Canadians and Mexicans only, there is also the TN-1 visa.
I haven’t done much research on this one since I’m neither Canadian nor Mexican but what I know is this:
Duration of stay: 1 year, extensible indefinitely as long as the job is alive
What it is about: Basically same as a H-1B visa, but with a better “duration of stay” (as long as you have the job).
What’s the problem?: Your job must be among those in this list. Also, same as H-1B, you must have a job offer and everything before applying.

There is also another common one, although not work-related. I am talking of the F-1 visa, or student visa. If I get accepted in one of my colleges, I will most probably be applying for one.
Duration of stay: It goes without saying that this visa is tied to your education, therefore the duration of an F-1 visa will depend on the duration of your enrolment.
What it is about: A student-only visa given through academic institutions. That means that you must first be accepted by a school/college (where you’ll then receive special forms) before applying for an F-1. This visa is only for academic studies (or language training), not for vocational eduction (that is an M visa).
What’s the problem?: The main problem is that you are not allowed to work, save for “practical training” (meaning mainly internships) and sometime college work. For this kind of work you need a prior authorization from the USCIS, extra headache. You also can’t apply for Social Security (although this depends on your work-status) nor Medicare.

You could go to a community college (therefore have an F-1 visa) and whilst you are “over there” start looking for work that could fit an H-1B or TN-1 visa, although I’m not sure how useful that would be ultimately.

There are tons of other non-immigrant visas out there but those I thought were the main ones regarding the “writing field” were put here.

Next up tommorow: Green Cards.

If you have questions please feel free to email me or post a comment.


Email This Post Print This Post

Be the first to comment

Post image for Why I hate French “television”

As I posted previously, I love TV (mostly anglophone TV), but I loathe French TV.
The two must not be confused as they are not the same thing, although it might be confusing at times.
There are virtually millions of reasons why I hate French TV but here are a few (beware, long post ahead):

Dubbing

I hate dubbing. This is the worst invention ever made.
A few people ask me why I hate dubbing so much.
I mean, seriously?

If you know how to read, there is no reason why you shouldn’t watch everything in its original version.
Take Oldboy for instance. I do not know Korean, yet every time I watched this movie, I watched it non-dubbed (with of course subtitles). Not only that but it’s one of my favorite movies (along with Children of Men and Fight Club).

Dubbing supresses the essence of the dialogue and everything around it. You may get what the content of the dialogue is about, but you won’t get what it is about really, who it is about. Let alone all the other aspects such as the actor’s intonation, accent, etc.
The same goes for books in my opinion. If you know the language in which the book was written, no reason to read the translation. It also makes for a great exercise for people who want to hone their reading skills.

People are studying Shakespeare in French classes here. Yes, you read me right.

As for the link between dubbing and French television is simple: it’s the same thing basically, everything non-French is dubbed, you don’t have a choice.

Rip-off

A)“Adaptation”

Okay, this is technically not a rip-off as they payed for the use of the format. But in my view it is rip-off in that it litteraly rips-off the essence of the show and the result is a dumbed down, pointless version.

Let’s take Survivor for example. Yes, I like Survivor. I don’t consider myself a “reality TV buff” but I also don’t consider Survivor to be really “reality TV”. For me it’s more of a survival gameshow than anything else. This is a long debate in itself but I dislike putting shows in certain boxes when its actually more grey than this.
So, as I was saying.
Survivor (which ironically is a loose adaptation of a Swedish program –this post is a bash on French TV, I love everything else mind you-) is a game where its tagline resumes what the show is about: Outwit, outplay, outlast.

Now take the French version, Koh-Lanta. One of the main difference is an episode length, while the US version is about 40–45 minutes long, the French version is at least double that, and that is for every episode.
Yes, here in France everything is supersized. All the French “TV shows” are actually 90 minutes long, and all the prime-time shows are 2 hours (with commercial).
This also leads to channels showing 2 x 3–4 episodes of US TV Shows in a single night!

In Survivor you have twists and turns, it’s real drama that (again, in my opinion) could sometimes be compared loosely to a TV Drama.
On the other hand we have Koh-Lanta, no twists, with rules quite unclear, poor choice of candidates, and challenges that repeat themselves from season to season. The choice in scenery is also disapointing.

I could go on and on and on again about that, but let’s go to the real rip-offs.

B) Copycat

Sometimes they also just produce shows that are really rip-offs.
For instance C.S.I.
I’m not a big fan of C.S.I. but it’s successful, so what the hell.
We have our own little C.S.I., it’s called R.I.S.
It’s based on an Italian TV show of the same name and the similarities to C.S.I. are endless.
Although there’s one main difference, each season is basically comprised of 5–8 episodes of 90 minutes long.
That’s the French format for you.

Useless(ness)

Here in France, it seems no one has any original ideas. I mean seriously, our most successful “TV Show” (this is not the right term when talking about the content on French television) is probably Julie Lescaut. If you go on the IMDb you can see for yourself that this show started way back in 1992. Before Friends, E.R. and X-Files!
And it’s still alive.
Yet again, the seasons have 5–8 episodes of 90 minutes long. We have tons of shows like Julie Lescaut, and I do mean like Julie Lescaut, in every sense of the word. Same stories, same format, same concept.
Totally unoriginal. And it’s been forever.

Last but not least my personal favorite:
The remote control
The TV channels

FOX is known to be an awful network, but we got them beat: Meet TF1.
Just to give you a glimpse at the sadistically commercial nature of the channel, let’s have a look at a 2004 now-very-famous quote from the now-ex CEO of TF1 (Patrick Le Lay):
Notre boulot, c’est de vendre à Coca-Cola du temps de cerveau humain disponible
Which very rougly translates to:
Our job is to sell Coca-Cola available time from the human brain.
Yes, he said that.
My main problem is not the fact that he said that, after all it’s really every network’s job to sell advert, my problem lies with the fact that to acheive said job, TF1 (and M6, among others) use, as we saw today, programs of very poor quality, unoriginal, and redundant.
They surround crappy ads with crappy programs.

There is also the problem of how the TV channels treat shows, and that is partially linked to the CSA (the French FCC if you will).
Let’s take 24 for instance. I understand how several episodes are hard to watch, lots of violence, etc.
So it’s forbidden to people under 16 (basically TV MA).
Okay… Now what?
Not enough?
Okay, let’s put the show at 1AM (we’re talking new episodes here).
Still not enough?
Okay, let’s censure half the episode.
Yes they do that, for a TV MA show broadcasted at 1AM.
And that is 24.
They have also done that for Heroes and Lost.

Absolutely no respect for the viewer nor programs not made by them.

And that was why I hate French television.


Email This Post Print This Post

Be the first to comment