facebook_pixel Press "Enter" to skip to content

Looking to start your TV writing journey?

Posts published in “Year: 2010

Kill your babies!

So there’s this writer who’s trying to break an episode.
He’s spending every waking hours thinking about it.
Suddenly, this brilliant scene comes to mind. And, ‘oh my God!, I finally found a way of putting in that great catchphrase! It fits so perfectly!’
From breaking it, the writer moves on to actually penning the script.
As always, everything continues to evolve. Characters grow, scenes get trimmed, dialogues get sharper.
Except for that one brilliant scene with the great catchphrase. It sticks with the script no matter the context. Even during the rewrite, and despite everyone telling him how problematic the scene is, ‘I can’t bring myself to remove that brilliant scene with that great catchphrase. It’s so iconic, it transcends storytelling, or acts. You don’t get it.’

Sounds familiar?

If that writer were to step back, he’d see how obvious it is that nor the scene or the catchphrase have their place in the script anymore. (And actually they’re not as groundbreaking as he thinks they are)
These words are his babies. And if he’s not willing to kill them now, they’ll kill his work later.

We all have them in our scripts. Great ideas/scenes/lines/characters that were so inspiring at the moment of their creation that we can’t even think about ending their existence. You know the ones.
They have quite literally become our babies, our children. We feed them our excuses for keeping them in the script, even though deep down we know they don’t serve any purpose.
The more you let them hang around, the more you grow attached to them, the less you want to delete them, and the more you let them hang around.

If there’s one lesson from the Lost finale to be had, it’s this one: you need to let go and move on.
Take a harsh look at your script and be ready to make some sacrifices in slashing your words.

So what can you do to ease the pain?
I hate deleting my words as much as the next guy.
Subconsciously (or maybe I’m plain aware of this), I think that if I cut something out of the script, it’s gone forever.
To eliminate the doubt I have a ‘limbo file‘, a separate text document where I cut/paste into it all the stuff I’m removing from the script.
This is certainly not the greatest idea ever. It’s not organized, and actually it’s pretty random. But at the back of my mind, I’m somewhat comforted by the fact that if push comes to shove, I can always find again the things I deleted.
Truth is though, I will never open this file to read back my aborted content, but it does the trick since the words are gone from the finished product.
What this ‘limbo file’ allows me to do is cut the BS, and more importantly move on with the work.

Those kinds of scenes you think are vital but are not were never meant to be permanent.
Yes, even if you can’t consciously realize it.
At best, they were like crutches; supporting your other beats until you found a better solution.
At worst, they were buoys sent by your wondrous mind to keep you afloat and avoid getting script-stuck forever.

As a wise man once said (paraphrase alert): be attached to the meaning of your words, not the words themselves.

Your sentiments are keeping you from growing, evolving, shielding your skin (perplexing imagery, I know).
It is time for you to take a step forward and embrace changes in your script.
After all, we’re talking about a rewrite; and that doesn’t come without a few pains.

So whether you need a ‘limbo file’ or not, do yourself and your work a favor: kill your babies.

Around the comedy spec

I am not a specialist when it comes to comedy specs.
After all, I’m no funny man.
With that said, I did want to shine a light on several very interesting articles that can undoubtedly be helpful to fellow comedy/sitcom speccers out there (and actually everyone else too).

Let’s start with one of the masters of classic sitcom, Chuck Lorre.
He recently did an interview for Esquire entitled ‘How to Make a Successful but Critically Ignored Sitcom.’
Though you might not be interested in creating the next Two and a Half Men, don’t let the title of his article fool you. Chuck Lorre does give some helpful advice that every aspiring sitcom writers should, if not follow, then at least know of.

Over at the [eventual] sitcom writer, Evan has made a must-read in doing an extensive ‘Spec Script Toolkit‘ for not one or two, but three sitcoms (and he’s keeping them coming).
Community
Modern Family
The Big Bang Theory
Pick your poison.
All of them are broken into several parts; namely Homework (Part One), Story & Structure (Part Two), Characters (Part Three), Numbers (Part Four), and I’m guessing other stuff to come.
This reminds me a bit of my Spec Flashpoint series (way back when), only this time for sitcoms, and better.
Currently Community is the farthest along in the breakdown, but Evan is much more awesome than I when it comes to updating his blog. So don’t go far.
And even if you’re not planning to break a sitcom spec, there are tons of things to learn from this process.
This is pretty much the same state of mind you should be in before starting a spec (based on a TV show), that is: research, research, research.
You’re not getting into the head of the writers or the characters if you’re not first trying to find a way inside.

Last but not least, HWAS interviewed writer Ron Rappaport in a piece called ‘From Assistant to Sitcom Creator: Writing for Tweens.’
Who cares about tweens you might say.
Well I always like linking interviews of writers because, whatever their field, you will always learn something new and will always get a piece of life experience. After all, everyone has a different H-Wood experience.

And to borrow Evan’s ‘Lesson learned while writing this blog entry‘:
It is never a bad thing to be open to new things, regardless of your genre of choice. Read, listen and be aware.
What’s the worst that could happen? You learn something new?

Born to Run (Emmys 2010)

Already another award show?
It’s as if time isn’t standing still anymore.
Unlike when you’re stuck watching an award show. Badum-ching.

For once, the opening Emmy number was good (surprisingly). It was also a nice big ad for FOX’s Glee…on NBC.
I do have one major caveat though: Jimmy Fallon, please stop singing.
I mean it.
We could all tell you had a hard time catching your breath and you were pretty much completely off-cue during the live part of the song.
I do wonder why they didn’t use Auto-Tune like Simon Cowell.

The best moments of the night didn’t come from Fallon (as expected, like the Conan jokes), but from Neil Patrick Harris, Ricky Gervais, and even a clip featuring the Modern Family cast discussing ‘options’ with a fake suit.

The running-gag of Twitter jokes was as bad as that time we had reality presenters as actual hosts of the Emmys. Remember?
You shouldn’t be scarce on jokes when you’re hosting an award ceremony, that is all.

There were several awkward moments during the night, especially with some presenters. The first one coming to mind is the Matthew Perry/Lauren Graham duo that epicly bombed.
That was soon followed by John Krasinski forgetting his lines–even though the teleprompter was right in front of him.
Awkward.

This year was also the year of popular vote it seems, with lots of newcomers and fan faves winning. Jane Lynch, Jim Parsons, Eric Stonestreet, Aaron Paul, you name it.
And, yes, Bryan Cranston did deserve to win again!
I’m however sorry to point out that Eddie Falco was not the best choice as Lead Actress in a Comedy. She even admitted it herself.


Still nothing new under the sun regarding the Best Drama-type categories, which brings me to this now-popular joke: Will Erin Levy get fired for winning an Emmy? *rimshot*

Lost didn’t win anything.
I find it sad that Darlton actually used as their Emmy joke a true anecdote showing how poorly planned their mythology was. Though that’s old news by now surely.

It’s funny that the Emmy peeps recycled last year’s bottom-screen announcement, such as ‘George Clooney in 17 minutes’ or ‘True Blood cast in 21 minutes.’
I mean really?
Is that what people watched the show for, or is NBC that desperate to get eyeballs?
Funny to think that the cast of True Blood is also seemingly as popular as Clooney.
At least this year they didn’t pull out the ‘In Memoriam in 30 seconds‘ card.

Oh well.
At least a deserving series won for Best Comedy.