facebook_pixel Press "Enter" to skip to content

Looking to start your TV writing journey?

Posts tagged as “Readers’ Mail”

Is it too late to spec? (Readers’ Mail)

We’ll do short and sweet on this week’s Readers’ Mail as Eavvon asks:

You mentioned [with asterisks] that some 1st season shows wouldn’t be accepting specs. Specifically, Blackish… However, I’m developing a spec for next season. Am I too late? […] I spoke directly to [an agency] and they said I should send something to them. Not that it will guarantee anything. So maybe that’s the path I go down…or maybe I just keep hustling for the next few months and then try to apply to a fellowship program next year?

The “asterisks” in my Drama and Comedy Spec Script lists specifically relate to the WB Writing Fellowship/Program. They identify shows WB does not accept (or rather did not—their deadline was end of May).

To answer your other questions—
I’m actually in the midst of writing a large post where I’ll tackle most of your Qs, but the gist is: don’t put all your eggs in one basket.
There isn’t “one path”, rather multiple ones that hopefully converge into you breaking (and a career).
If a known agency is open to reading your material—go for it! It’s actually fairly rare for agents to be open to reading new writers (without any recommendation) so you should pursue every opportunity (assuming you’re ready for them).

It is also never too late to write specs. In fact, the more you write, the better off you are. If anything, they’re great samples and training. One could even say that your job as a staff writer will be, basically, to write specs (albeit more professionally).
If you’re worried about being “out of date” when next season rolls around, don’t be. Even if your show is heavily serialized (which Blackish isn’t), your number one worry should always be to craft a compelling, unique spec. Not keep up to date with the various narrative developments from the live show.

I’d say hone your spec(s), and when you have an awesome one ready, send it out. Maybe they’ll love it and rep you. Either way, it will only help you when applying to the fellowships next year.

Good luck with everything!

If you (who’s reading this) have a question you’d like an answer to, feel free to contact me about it.

Write on.



Is a pilot script needed when pitching? (Readers’ Mail)

Have you ever wondered…
Do I need to write a spec pilot for my pitch meeting?

On today’s Readers’ Mail, we answer this quandary with Jean-Luc’s e-mail:

I was wondering if you could clarify whether a pilot script is needed when pitching a one hour TV drama. I have heard and been told that I definitely need a pilot script AND I have been told that I just need a detailed outline and descriptions of the world, characters, season arc of the TV concept/idea. If the show is picked up the writing for each episode would be done later. I am interested in knowing which route I should take…TV pitch with treatment and pilot outline or treatment/outline and pilot script.
I’m more interested in having the TV show created and consulting (or selling the idea/concept) rather than writing for the series.

You’re asking a lot of great questions about pitching, which could also be phrased another way:

Where is the line between doing work on spec, and getting paid for it?

With rare exceptions, spec scripts are primarily meant to be samples of your work, not sellable commodities.

Keeping that in mind, let’s ask a few more questions:
Who are you meeting with? (prodcos, studios, networks)
What is the meeting: a pitch meeting or more a general?
Why are you getting a meeting with them?

Assuming it is indeed a pitch meeting with, say, a prodco, then they called you in because either:
a) they want to hear you pitch something they know you’re doing/they’re already interested in; or
b) they liked you/other things you’ve done and want to hear fresh ideas.

So–

Is a pilot script needed for pitch meetings?

If you already have one, then that’s that. Maybe they’ve read the spec to said pitched show, and called you in for that. The pitch will then revolve around the vision you’re bringing and future of that world. They’re already interested in the project. It’s now a question of being invested in your version of it.

If you have NOT written your pilot, and are getting pitch meetings for new stuff, then I would not advise you to write a fully-fledged pilot on spec (unless you plan to use it as a sample regardless).
The reason is simple: why would you be doing all this work for free? If the company is that invested in the pitch, then they’ll pay you to go to the next step.
On top of that, there’s probably (hopefully) going to be some back-and-forth between you and the people in the room. It may change your approach to the pilot.

That doesn’t mean you should pitch out of nothing.

Knowing your pilot and world inside-out is an absolute must.
When it comes to content, everyone has their own pitch best practices. You can check some of my “Profiles of Television” interview series with TV writers and development executives to hear how they do it, and what they prefer.
I’ve personally sat on convoluted pitches involving cardboard maps of worlds and season storylines. Those are intricate “Game of Thrones-esque” pitches, and definitely not the norm, but they work when needed.

Ultimately, your job is to convey your show, your story, and your world. And it all starts with the pilot.
That means that, in your pitch, you’ll probably tell what goes on in the first episode. You should know for (at least) yourself the detailed outline. Past that, description of the world/characters/broad season arc(s) are also expected. “Leave-behinds” can be good too, but they shouldn’t be more than a few pages (at most).
Again, the level of details needed is on a case-by-case basis. The person you’re pitching to should know what they’re buying into, and be intrigued about its potential.

Now about your other question —

Consulting for a TV show

I’m guessing you’re not referring to being a technical consultant (e.g. doctor on a medical show), but rather a creative consultant.

With features, you could, maybe (and extremely rarely), sell some kind of concept/draft and walk away. Not so with TV.
It all boils down to this: television writing isn’t about ideas, it’s about executions. Writers are hired because they are either idea machines and/or great at running with ideas, not because of just “one cool thing”. And that’s not even mentioning how difficult it is to sell anything TV-related to begin with.

Where do creative consultants come from? Well, they’re already known quantities. For example, a famed crime author could partner with a screenwriter to sell an adaptation of a novel series. In that case, the author may become a creative consultant (if not more). They could also be a known producer or writing EP. If J.J. Abrams sneezes something, you can bet everyone will bid on it.

If you (who’s reading this) have a question you’d like an answer to, feel free to contact me about it.

Write on.

Animated or Live-Action TV Show Spec? (Readers’ Mail)

Now here’s a question…
Is live-action better than animation when it comes to writing TV specs?

On today’s Readers’ Mail, we tackle the big debate thanks to Paul’s question:

Would an animated show like Archer or American Dad be a good choice as a spec script for [the TV writing fellowships]? I worry that a live-action show would be a more appropriate idea and I don’t want to immediately shoot myself in the foot with a bad show choice.
I typically prefer watching and writing comedy, but if sticking a group of zombie snacks in a prison and calling it Walking Dead gets my spec to the top of the pile, that works too.

First off, you need to pick your lane. By that I mean: if you want to write comedy, by all means focus on comedy. But you shouldn’t write a one-hour spec “just because” it may be more well-received (or not). A Walking Dead spec will only work for a drama writer.
Considering that you seem to prefer writing comedy, your next point of order should be to pick a good comedy to spec.
Which brings us to your great question: should you spec an animated show, or a live-action comedy? And does it really make any difference?

The short answer is: no, it doesn’t really make a difference. Up to a point.

Now onto the longer answer.
If you want to apply to the Nickelodeon fellowship, although they do accept animated specs, they can occasionally frown upon them. Or, at the very least, frown upon animated Nickelodeon specs. It’s their bread-and-butter, and they’d rather you show your comedic writing chops through the live-action model.
In regards to the other fellowships, the door is wide open.

With that said, the reality is that there are fewer legitimate animated options to spec. This year for instance, you could write an Archer, a Simpsons/American Dad, a Bob’s Burgers, a Bojack Horseman, a Rick & Morty, and—that’s about it. Four of those six are pretty much over-specced and old, and the other two are somewhat of a gamble. Bojack will undoubtedly become popular this time next year, but it still is a risk right now. Warner Bros. for example is not accepting it.

So, what does my convoluted answer really mean?
Half-hour animated specs are just as valid as live-action ones. In a vacuum. Given their rarity and varying popularity, finding a good animated show to spec is already a difficult task, much less crafting a great one.
FX’s Archer was a very popular comedy spec for a lot of people in its hey-days, but you could argue the show was already this close to being live-action.
Yes, a great animated TV spec will always be a strong choice for any TV writing fellowships. The format is rarely what detracts readers from pushing your script to the top. It’s more likely that the animated show in question isn’t that well-regarded to begin with.

As usual, the answer to most spec choice questions should be boiled down to: pick the show you will write the best spec for. You should not discard a great spec idea just because a show is too much or not enough popular. If you have the bestest Archer spec ever, by all means write it and send it out. Just be aware it’s pretty much most people’s only choice (with Bob’s Burgers) when it comes to recent animated shows.

Finally, in regards to professionally writing in animation as opposed to live-action, I’ll refer you to this post by BFF Kiyong Kim on the subject. Here’s an excerpt:

Several animation writers in the studio all gave us the same advice – don’t write for animation! They told us to go work in live action. The pay is better because it’s WGA and there are residuals.

Gotta love straightforward salary advice.

So what do you think dear reader? If you have a question, feel free to send me a message.

Write on.