facebook_pixel Press "Enter" to skip to content

Looking to start your TV writing journey?

Posts tagged as “Science-Fiction”

That's just plain dumb

The title refers to what Isaac Asimov would have said about the Sci Fi/Syfy name change, at least according to Mitch Rubenstein, a co-founder of the Sci-Fi Channel soon to be named the same as a venereal disease.

Rubenstein says:

What would Isaac have said if the name was instead SyFy Channel. He would have said (we believe): That’s just plain dumb.


The Syfy executives here seen posing for the fans

The outrage continues following the announcement last week of a massive rebranding of the cable SF network.

So who exactly is for this name change?
Beats me.

Continuing on Syfy infos, the network is setting up three minis, all of them adaptations, and two of them backdoor pilots.

The first one is Riverworld, based on the fantasy book series by Philip José Farmer, about a world occupied by everyone who has every lived on Earth.
It should be noted that the characters (and/or historical figures) will be played by actors in their 20s.

The second one, however, is based a comic-book character created by Lee Falke.
I am of course talking about The Phantom.
For those who know what the hell is going on with the character, the story should focus on the 23rd Phantom.


Not an actual poster for the Syfy mini

What is even more interesting is who is behind the script: Carnivàle‘s own Daniel Knauf.
I can’t wait to see it.

But we’re gonna have to wait.

Both four-hour minis (or rather TV-movies) use basically the same format as previously used for Battlestar Galactica. So, if succcessful enough, prepare to see two new shows in a couple of years or so.
The two minis are scheduled to premiere sometime next year.
Me thinks Caprica will be part of this little scheduling game.

Syfy has also ordered Alice, a new take on the Alice in Wonderland classic. This retooling should be in the same vein as Tin Man was for The Wizard of Oz. The adaptation is currently planned for a winter broadcast.

Despite the shitty brand management, at least we can look forward to a few things.

Battlestar Galactica: A love-hate relationship

Battlestar Galactica was always a special show for me.
It is probably the only show that was both on my Top 5 list, and whatever you call the worst show list.

I was there, in front of my TV screen, when the mini-series that launched it all was shown on Sci-Fi.
December 8th, 2003.

Out of all the shows on my Top 5 list, it is the only one I had the opportunity to basically see “live” on TV given my travels to the U.S.A., or rather it is the only premiere out of all the shows I saw “live”.
During the same season, the Angel series finale was to be shown as well.

Interesting how those two epis are in my mind amongst the best of their shows.

Anyway, when I’m talking about my “Top 5 list”, it is not of the best shows on TV, it is rather the five shows that had the most profound impact on me (as a person and/or a writer).
That is why I don’t have a “favorite show” or whatever.
Like for any art form, I believe the experience surrounding the actual piece shouldn’t be forgotten in the equation.
How you experience something is as important (if not more perhaps) as the thing you are experiencing.
Add that to your own involvement in the piece, and you’ve got yourself an adequate albeit subjective way to classify art.

I don’t deny that Mad Men, The Wire, or, hell, even The Sopranos may be amongst the best shows ever, but they are not really on my list.
What is on my list of my Top 5 shows might shock you.

But I digress.
Back to BSG.

I very early on started to love the show.
If I had to name one show at the time that had my full attention, it was this one.
Buffy and Angel were basically over with, Six Feet Under also had passed.

BSG had mythology I could sink my teeth into.
The first two seasons were great.
The Peabody they got was really in my mind for all the episodes during these seasons (save for Black Market).
I was floored by the season two cliffhanger, albeit afraid of how they would handle the time-jump, especially given how other shows continued with such a shift.

All in all, everything seemed great.

Then Season 3 happened, and the curtain dropped.

When a show you are passionate about for 2-3 years rips out of under your feet its whole mythology and voids the 2 seasons you spent on it…

Just looking back at who could and could not be a Cylon pre-Season 3 is pretty evident to how far they nullified their own mythos.

“The Cylon Plan” just disappeared as soon as they realised it wasn’t coherent at all.
I find it quite funny that they are trying to retcon the first two seasons and adding Season 3/4-mytho to it thanks to a special 2-hour TV Movie comically named The Plan.

Needless to say, but I’ll say it anyways, the word “betrayal” came to mind several times.
Yes, some shows can make you feel as strongly as that. I’m sure you have your own.

So, yeah, Ronald D. Moore having bashed the show to death due to poor planning and mythology, coupled with somewhat atrocious episodes throughout the two last seasons, lead me to loathe Battlestar Galactica.
I really did not understand all the praise it kept getting, even after it was painfully obvious how far away it had gone since its first couple of seasons.

The show had ended up for me at the polar opposite of where it had once started not too long ago.

But now we come to last night’s episode.
The final one, the end of a journey.

Series finales are always important and defining.
They always in my mind make or break a show (unless it is an unwitting series finale).
They will also often be amongst my favorite episodes of a show.

The Angel series finale is one of the finest hours of television I have ever seen.
The same goes for the Six Feet Under finale. Who didn’t cry during the end with that montage sequence on Sia’s Breathe Me?

So, sure enough, the Battlestar Galactica series finale had a huge load to bear on its (frail) shoulders.
I won’t comment on the first hour of the episode, which was basically the culmination of two seasons worth of craziness.
I also won’t go into the actual “answers” or resolutions to certain mysteries that, as expected, were ridiculous and frankly pointless.

The last 30 minutes, however, were simply astonishing.
Bear McCreary, as always, delivered sublime music.
The acting, as always, was great.

The conclusion to the various characters arc did somewhat deliver.
I even admit, the end had at various times some personal resonance.

The show had come full circle.

And just like that, Battlestar Galactica was back on my Top 5 list.
I came to accept the show for what it really is, and over-looked the ridiculousness of its 2-season mythology.

“All that has happened before will happen again”, they say.
Sure enough, what happened before, what happened during the first two seasons, happened again during those last 30 minutes of the show.
And, at the end of the day, and at the end of the page, that’s all that matters: We have to care.

And I did.
I cared.

Farewell Battlestar Galactica.

Syfy is a serious condition, please consult your doctor immediately.

By now, you most likely have heard about the Sci Fi channel name rebranding.

I like how there’s a massive backlash going on around regarding the change, and for good reasons.

Says Tim Brooks:

We spent a lot of time in the ’90s trying to distance the network from science fiction, which is largely why it’s called Sci Fi. […] But even the name Sci Fi is limiting.

Seriously?

Let me get this straight.
You want to change everything from your logo to your slogan, and from the brand to your core audience (you know, the one that made you what you are now). And do all that for absolutely no reason at all (given the channel’s top-10 network status)?

Distancing yourself from the SF pseudo-“geeks” just by changing the name and the logo is not going to get you very far, and it’s downright disrespectful.

Tim Brooks adds:

The name Sci Fi has been associated with geeks and dysfunctional, antisocial boys in their basements with video games and stuff like that, as opposed to the general public and the female audience in particular.

I think you lost me there somewhere.

You can’t both loose your core audience (by literally insulting them) and at the exact same time try to make them stay to watch the very thing you lost them on.

That’s like saying you make quality science-fiction products and then you put Battlestar Galactica next to something called Spring Break Shark Attack.
Oh, wait.

Jason Ramboz said it best:

You continue to perpetuate the very stereotypes from which you wish to distance yourselves. Instead of acknowledging what the literary and academic worlds have known for at least two decades, that SF is more than just “space, aliens[,] and the future,” you’d rather continue to sucker audiences in with lowest-common-denominator drivel and derivatives of ideas that intelligent audiences were calling inane ten years ago.

Exactly.

Many will tune out after the Battlestar Galactica finale.
I personally will continue to watch some of the “Syfy” original series (most likely not on the actual network though).
The channel has some great new shows coming up.
Namely Warehouse 13.

As for the other series, it’s funny how Sci Fi (or is it Syfy now?) tries to detatch and distance itself from what has come before the change.
And by that I mean they’re making spin-offs.

You want to rebrand yourself by trying to cash in on the same stuff you revile?
Way to go!

Sci Fi Channel’s attempt at rebranding is utterly ridiculous, especially when there is going to be massive rating drops starting next week.
Add that to spin-offs no one will watch because the audience is being dissed, and you get a total disaster.

Implosion in 3, 2, 1…