facebook_pixel Press "Enter" to skip to content

Looking to start your TV writing journey?

Posts tagged as “TV Shows”

The Best Breaking Bad Parodies

We start off our special week with some humor. Like Lost before it, Breaking Bad has had during its five-season run (even more so during its latter years) a ton of parodies. Dramatic series are ripe for the picking.
Here’s a look back at some of the greatest parodies, from the first few seasons until the very end. For science.

ABC’s Breaking Bad – The Sitcom

We start off with one of the oldest parodies around: what if Breaking Bad was an ABC show, and a sitcom on top of that? There’s your answer:

Breaking Bad RPG

There’s no video-game adaptation of the show (yet), so CollegeHumor decided to create their own old-school RPG version of it.

Breaking Swift: ‘We Are Never Ever Gonna Cook Together’

Whether you love, hate, or love to hate Taylor Swift, there’s no denying that this music video is seriously entertaining.

Breaking Abbey

Last year, as the new season of Downton Abbey was about to premiere in the US, The Colbert Report decided to do a great parody of the show, mixing it with the Breaking Bad formula. Special guest stars: a bunch of people.

Breaking Simpsons

In one of the longest couch gags in Simpsons’ history, the animated show decided to do an entire bit parrodying Breaking Bad‘s classic cooking montages.

Breaking Bad: The Middle School Musical

What if a middle school decided to recap five seasons of Breaking Bad, and make it a musical? An instant classic.

Joking Bad (Late Night with Jimmy Fallon)

The latest, and perhaps best Breaking Bad parodies around. This Jimmy Fallon version is actually a fully-fledged short-film featuring cameos by the show’s stars. Gotta end on a high note.

Which is your favorite Breaking Bad spoof?

If you don’t listen to the Breaking Bad Insider Podcast, you’re a bad writer

It has been well established that I’ve considered Breaking Bad to be the best show currently on TV for a while now. As a professional hipster, I’ve been following the show since it first aired (the days of yore, 2008). Before it got all mainstream and everything.
Anyways.
When Season 2 started, Kelley Dixon, one of the show’s main editors, began making 1-hour podcasts for every episode, featuring pretty much everyone from the show.

I’m not prone to hyperbole (*cough*), but this is pretty much the best behind-the-scene discussion about a TV show in the history of everything. Especially on such an episode-by-episode basis.

Let’s think for a second about what has come before this.
The closest equivalent I can think of is Ronald D. Moore’s Battlestar Galactica commentaries online. However, they were mostly just that: basic commentary tracks. It was (almost always) only him, and they were limited by the episode’s length.
The Meltdown/Nerdist Writers Series podcast is one of the best resources about the craft of TV writing, but as the time is split between three to five different writers, you can only have so much nitty-gritty discussion/content.
Damon Lindelof/Carlton Cuse’s Lost “podcasts” couldn’t have been farther from what they were supposed to be about.
And don’t you dare mention Talking Bad/Talking Dead/Talking Crap, or what can only be described as fluff pieces and waste of (air)time.

On the other hand, the Breaking Bad Insider podcast doesn’t have any such limitations.
In fact, here are the four main reasons why it’s the best BTS discussion I’ve seen (or rather heard) about a TV show, in like ever:
1. It’s done for every episode. For real. When do you get a writer– hell, anyone talking about a specific episode for more than a few minutes? Seriously, name one show that has done hour-long discussions about their individual episode. Even The Simpsons have only 25-minute commentary tracks on the DVDs (see point 3).
2. The podcasts have all the relevant creative people talking about their own episodes. That means the Breaking Bad writer, director, cast, editor and producers (plus other misc. guests). Vince Gilligan is also always present (with Bryan Cranston a close second).
3. As pointed out above, unlike usual commentaries (on DVDs and such), they’re not limited by time. Any standard commentary track is usually “synced” with the content, meaning you only have that scene’s length of time to talk about it, or at the very least the length of the episode (20-40 minutes). No such problem here. They go on as long as needed, usually around 60 minutes. This week’s Breaking Bad podcast, for 5×09, ran about 75 minutes. It’s much more than just a “Breaking Bad commentary”: it’s a deep-dive discussion.
4. The most important point: they talk about the craft. And I’m not only talking about the writers. The guests are always very candid about their own production perspective of the episode, everything from the page to the screen. It is informative, and truly inspiring. It also pretty much confirms my pet-theory that Breaking Bad is one of the most thought-out shows on television.

At this point, you must already be rushing to download and listen to one (assuming you watch the show). Hopefully, I don’t have to explain why you should be interested in how the sausage is made, especially if you want to work in this medium.

The bottom line is simple: learning how one of the best shows on TV is being written, directed, acted, produced and edited is something you should (already) be doing.
You know, for science.

Follow this link to stream the Breaking Bad Insider Podcast:
http://www.amctv.com/shows/breaking-bad/insider-podcast-season-5
You can also subscribe to to podcast on iTunes:
http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/breaking-bad-insider/id311058181

Tread lightly.

7 Screenwriting lessons from Farscape

A key part of writing for television is watching television. And learning from it.
Screenwriting lessons from tackles series past and present, analyzing them through the prism of screenwriting.

I’ve been on a sci-fi binge recently, so I decided to rewatch one of the greatest (and perhaps underrated) science-fiction series of all time: Rockne S. O’Bannon’s awesome Farscape.
It’s fun, it’s dark, it’s light, it’s amazing. Both serialized and stand-alone, the show has revolutionized, in more ways than one, the genre it was set in.
Almost ten years have past since it ended, but the legacy lives on.

[I’ll be talking about the show as a whole, so I highly recommend you watch the whole show before reading this post — it’s worth it.]


Lesson 1: Serialization and stand-alone stories are not mutually exclusive

Perhaps one of the most controversial lessons to take away from Farscape is this one.
The first season’s first half is considered by many to be the worst. As always, the writers were still figuring out the characters, so it makes sense.
Until perhaps its third season, Farscape wasn’t overtly serialized, but it still kept small amounts of mythology spread throughout. In other words, it was always giving viewers information (big or small), even during seemingly stand-alone episodes.
You could say that anything about alien characters’ pasts is de facto mythological, but I’m here talking about factual hints or stories enhancing the season-long narrative.
The first season built up Crais and introduced Scorpius. The second season developed the relationships and continued the characters’ individual journeys.
You still need to have episodes accessible to new viewers, at first, but keep creating the launchpads for your bigger, upcoming stories.

Lesson 2: Entertain!

As much as we like to think we’re providing humanity with the greatest of cultural gifts, television is still, first and foremost, an entertainment medium.
Science-fiction can be a super-serious drama, but it can (and should) be entertaining.
Think back to Farscape‘s craziest, greatest hours of TV. Chances are it’s something you can’t imagine other sci-fi show to do. Hell, they even did a cartoon episode! Obviously, this may not be something you want to incorporate in your show, but playfulness should be.
Crichton also offers countless opportunities to entertain the viewers. He’s an odd duck thrown into a world he has no understanding of. You don’t have to create an Abed-like character that drops references left and right. Making someone you can relate with, and also someone fun, can be achieved other ways.
Don’t be dull. Be joyful.

Lesson 3: Never reset a psychological wound

As Farscape viewers will remember, Scorpius tortures Crichton in “Nerve” (1×18).
It’s shocking, disturbing, and, more importantly, impactful.
The show doesn’t pull that kind of story for cheap thrills or just raise stakes.
Long after the episode is over, the psychological toll is still present. Embedded forever into John Chrichton’s psyche.
Instead of forgetting about it the next episode, the show used this pivotal episode as a fundamental shift in Crichton’s persona. From then on, he’s unhinged, borderline crazy. Our perception is completely changed, and so is he.
In fact, this aspect of Crichton becomes a defining value of his character.
No one forgets the “Crackers Don’t Matter” episode (2×04) which introduces us to the lovely Harvey (the Faux/Mind Scorpius in John’s head). This is a very different approach from all sci-fi shows that came before Farscape. Just take a look at Star Trek TNG‘s very own “Chain of Command, Part II“. Picard is physically and psychologically tortured by Cardassians. The next episode, it’s a whole tabula rasa. A reset.
You can check an example of “Crazy Crichton” in this clip from “I Do, I Think” (2×12). You won’t see a Starfleet captain behaving like that (well…maybe Sisko).
Psychological scars last as much as physical ones, if not longer. It’s much harder to “fix” the mind than a flesh wound.
TV shows often forget that. You shouldn’t.

Lesson 4: Characters, not (stereo)types

Too many science-fiction shows reduce their characters, and alien races, into stereotypes.
I’m a big fan of Star Trek, but the early series tended to summarize each race with a particular characteristic. Klingons = warrior, Vulcans = logical, Ferrengi = greedy. Yes, those traits became three-dimensional as the franchise progressed (especially through DS9). But you could still see them written across their foreheads.
Going back to Farscape, you may summarize Rygel as “that puppet that farts helium”, but that is a huge disservice to the character. Even a few minutes into Farscape, you instantly know that he has more depth than other, actual human characters from other shows.
All Farscape characters have specific needs, and wants:
Ka D’Argo wants his son, Jothee, back. John Crichton wants to go home. Aeryn Sun wants to know where she belongs. Rygel wants to become the Dominar he once was. And Zhaan wants to reunite with Eiffel 65.
A show’s strength depends on the strength of the people. Even in a story-based world, you shouldn’t underestimate the importance of “real” characters over archetypes.

Lesson 5: Embrace relationships

One of the most damaging running plotlines a TV show can do is a “will they, won’t they.”
This isn’t Moonlighting anymore. And such a thread has been done to, well, death. At this point, the horse getting beaten is merely the remnants of a disheveled carcass. Gross.
The point here is, Farscape avoided that trap.
Relationships are inherently dramatic. Sexual tensions are not (anymore).
Crichton and Aeryn Sun “get together” pretty early on in the series. In fact, the show is usually at its best when they are together.
It’s very hard to sustain any kind of tension between two leads, especially over several seasons. The audience wants to see some progression, and you can’t maintain a constant status quo. The two people are attracted to each other, and spend a ton of time together. There’s no real reason to keep them apart.
One of Farscape‘s ballsiest move is, without a doubt, the cloning of John Crichton.
As a refresher, Crichton in “Thanks For Sharing” (3×07) gets doubled. One stays on Moya with D’Argo, the other ends up on Talyn with Aeryn.
The show ends up having its cake, and eating it too. In other words, it does both sides of the coin at the same time.
One Crichton ends up with Aeryn, but then he dies. The lonely Crichton on Moya is reunited with his love, but she has grieved for her loss, and has moved on.
It’s genuinely heart-wrenching. And it works. By killing one of the Crichton after he got together with Aeryn, you still have both a tragic “shipper” ending, and a stomach punch when she comes back, alone. You come back to a “will they, won’t they” plotline, but the reset makes it more powerful and interesting than ever.

Lesson 6: Accept the genre

Farscape was one of the last great space-operas on TV.
Science-fiction will always be a metaphor of the present by way of the future (at least mostly). Beyond that, it’s escapism. As much as I love Battlestar Galatica, the “grounded” and “serious” aspect of the series is completely different from the legitimately fun vibe of Farscape. It is a trend right now that fiction needs to be “dark” and “gritty,” which does make Farscape the last successful sci-fi show of its kind (at least for now).
Most of the BSG drama could be put on, say, a modern-day military ship, and it’d pretty much be the same plot. Tough luck doing that with Farscape.
If you only glance at it, it’s “a bunch of puppets”. Yeah, and Buffy‘s vampires are “a bunch of guys in weird makeup”.
The truth is, the show is more than that. It’s inventive, and it’s alien. A rare sight on TV nowadays.
Why am I going on a mini-tirade over this? Because the show was at its peak when it embraced wholeheartedly its genre roots. There are tons of sci-fi tropes out there, but it doesn’t mean you can’t play with them.
Farscape is genuine about the way it uses them.
In “A Human Reaction” (1×16), Crichton seemingly returns to Earth through a wormhole. Unsurprisingly, it’s all an illusion (created by aliens). The illusion is destroyed when he tries to go to the ladies restroom (since he has no memories of ever being there in the real world). In a later episode, “Won’t Get Fooled Again” (2×15), the same scenario seems to be happening (or at least Crichton thinks it is). He doesn’t think twice about it, and goes straight to the ladies’ room to test the theory.
Farscape understands that you probably have an encyclopedic knowledge of all things science-fiction, and it plays with your expectations. Aliens don’t speak English, so the show creates “translator microbes”.
It embraced the genre it was in, and subverted it.

Lesson 7: Get on with the story

Don’t tread water (or space). Farscape wasn’t afraid of big changes when they needed to be done.
When it happened, it feelt earned. Characters don’t always emerge unscathed. And they die when it makes sense. Crais sacrifices himself and Talyn at the end of Season 3 because there is no other way out of this mess. The title of the double-parter is, in fact, “Into the Lion’s Den”. With a name like that, you can’t expect to get out the same way you got in.
Earlier in that same season, the show’s usual format somewhat changed when the two Crichton separated. Even-numbered episodes are spent with the Talyn crew, and odd-numbered ones with the Moya people. The paradigm has shifted, which creates a more dynamic way of telling the “same old” stories. For all intents and purposes, the formula is relatively similar to what it’s always been. But it’s fresh. And the story has evolved.
Another, greater example, is the middle of Season 4. The entire crew gets to Earth. For real. The show stops playing game with one of its most crucial plotlines, and the biggest one for Crichton’s evolution.
It’s crazy to think that something so big, something most people take for granted as a “series-ender”, is in fact done midway through Season 4.
You don’t need a major twist every episode (see Lesson 1), but you still need a continuous story with real stakes.

What to take from the show

Be audacious, and bodacious, with your story and your characters. Don’t be afraid to make bold moves that will have a resonance within your show, and with your viewers. Make an impact. And have fun while doing it.